page 1
page 2
page 3
page 4
page 5
page 6
page 7
page 8
page 9
page 10
page 11
page 12
page 13
page 14
page 15
page 16
page 17
page 18
page 19
page 20
page 21
page 22
page 23
page 24
page 25
page 26
page 27
page 28
page 29
page 30
page 31
page 32
page 33
page 34
page 35
page 36
page 37
page 38
page 39
page 40
page 41
page 42
page 43
page 44
page 45
page 46
page 47
page 48
page 49
page 50
page 51
page 52
page 53
page 54
page 55
page 56
page 57
page 58
page 59
page 60
page 61
page 62
page 63
page 64
page 65
page 66
page 67
page 68
page 69
page 70
page 71
page 72
page 73
page 74
page 75
page 76
page 77
page 78
page 79
page 80
page 81
page 82
page 83
page 84
page 85
page 86
page 87
page 88
page 89
page 90
page 91
page 92
page 93
page 94
page 95
page 96
page 97
page 98
page 99
page 100
page 101
page 102
page 103
page 104
page 105
page 106
page 107
page 108
page 109
page 110
page 111
page 112
page 113
page 114
page 115
page 116
page 117
page 118
page 119
page 120
page 121
page 122
page 123
page 124
page 125
page 126
page 127
page 128
page 129
page 130
page 131
page 132
page 133
page 134

May 08 www.bus-ex.com 27 For nearly 100 years, the major employer in the city of Sydney on Cape Breton Island, Nova Scotia, was its steel mill and associated coke plant. In its heyday, 120,000 people depended on it, in one way or another, as it supported the island’s economy. Most recently operated by The Sydney Steel Corporation (SYSCO), the mill closed in 2001, and some of its former workers have since been involved in dismantling the entire facility and preparing the site for remediation. Until the mid-1980s, the mill used coke to fuel its blast furnaces. Coke is produced by slowly baking coal, causing contaminating liquids to leach out in the process. The run-off from the coke ovens over a period of 85 years found its way into the Muggah Creek tidal estuary, creating the Sydney Tar Ponds. The coke ovens were demolished in the early 1990s, but the site now contains over a million tons of contaminated soil and sediment, right on the waterfront in the center of the city. The Tar Ponds are now undergoing one of the largest environmental cleanups in Canada. The CDN $400 million project is managed by a provincial agency—with 70 percent of the funding provided by the federal government and 30 percent by the Province of Nova Scotia. In charge of the project is Frank Potter, president of the Sydney Tar Ponds Agency (STPA), which was created in 2001. “We’re called a special operating agency,” he says, “and I report to a provincial minister. We have around 600 acres of land right in the heart of the city that for all intents and purposes is either contaminated or desolate.” But cleaning up industrial contamination is not an easy matter, and early attempts to do so failed as a result of political controversy and technical difficulties. In 1986, the Canadian and Nova Scotia governments agreed to dredge the Tar Ponds and pump the sediments through a milelong pipeline to an incinerator and power plant. The incinerator was finally commissioned in 1994, after many delays, but the pipeline system proved unable to handle the thick, lumpy, Tar Ponds sludge, and the project was abandoned. In 1996, the Nova Scotia government proposed a plan to bury the Tar Ponds under slag procured from the steel mill, but local critics condemned SydneyTarPondsAgency

28 May 08 www.bus-ex.com it. “So the government decided to take a different approach this time and asked the community how they would like the site to be cleaned up,” says Potter. This, again, was a long drawn-out procedure, but the resulting plan has local support, technical competence, and is well on the way toward a satisfactory outcome in 2014. “They put in place a joint action group (JAG), and there were almost 1000 public meetings held to discuss the various options,” says Potter. This community-driven volunteer group represented local residents, businesses, community organizations, and three levels of government. In 2003, technical experts presented JAG with a shortlist of safe and effective cleanup solutions, and JAG led an intense public review of that report. While federal and provincial governments were considering the options, work began to demolish the buildings and clear the site ready for remediation. “We had a large number of buildings, tanks and smokestacks left over from the coking operation that were taken down,” says Potter. “We also had a couple of brooks and some municipal water lines to move.” A barrier also had to be built across the mouth of Muggah Creek to protect Sydney Harbour from further pollution as the cleanup proceeds. The method chosen to clean up the hazardous waste was solidification and stabilization (known for ease as SS), a proven solution dating back to the 1950s, in which cement is mixed into the contaminated material. The cement reacts chemically with water in the material being treated, creating physical and chemical changes that stabilize the hazardous constituents and prevent their escape into the environment. “We don’t turn it into concrete,” says Potter. “That’s a common misconception. First we have to dewater the ponds, then we add low volumes of cement into the sediment, with some slag that is left over from the steel making process.” When this process is complete, Potter explains, the ground will be above water level. “The ponds are actually very shallow. At low tide they are like mud flats, so when we have finished the cleanup, it will no longer be covered by tidal water, it will be usable land. We’re expecting it to become parkland, and there is potential for sports fields and other recreational activities.” After dewatering, the Agency expects to find all manner of debris at the bottom of the ponds, which will need to be cleaned up prior to disposal. A $9 million dollar material processing facility will be built to deal with this, and also to cleanse every vehicle before it leaves the site. The cleanedup debris will be recycled or go to a landfill site. The STPA has adapted its tender arrangements to encourage the participation of local firms. “We evaluate the tenders for price and award the contractor up to 85 points on that,” says Potter. “The remaining 15 points are allocated on the basis of what we call local economic benefits, to give some advantage to local companies with a local workforce.” The Agency is also involving Aboriginal companies, by taking the guidelines of the federal set-aside program a little further than is usual. “We’ve adopted that and tweaked it a little bit, by specifying that any partnerships should have at least 51 percent aboriginal