page 1
page 2
page 3
page 4
page 5
page 6
page 7
page 8
page 9
page 10
page 11
page 12
page 13
page 14
page 15
page 16
page 17
page 18
page 19
page 20
page 21
page 22
page 23
page 24
page 25
page 26
page 27
page 28
page 29
page 30
page 31
page 32
page 33
page 34
page 35
page 36
page 37
page 38
page 39
page 40
page 41
page 42
page 43
page 44
page 45
page 46
page 47
page 48
page 49
page 50
page 51
page 52
page 53
page 54
page 55
page 56
page 57
page 58
page 59
page 60
page 61
page 62
page 63
page 64
page 65
page 66
page 67
page 68
page 69
page 70
page 71
page 72
page 73
page 74
page 75
page 76
page 77
page 78
page 79
page 80
page 81
page 82
page 83
page 84
page 85
page 86
page 87
page 88
page 89
page 90
page 91
page 92
page 93
page 94
page 95
page 96
page 97
page 98
page 99
page 100
page 101
page 102
page 103
page 104
page 105
page 106
page 107
page 108
page 109
page 110
page 111
page 112
page 113
page 114
page 115
page 116
page 117
page 118
page 119
page 120
page 121
page 122
page 123
page 124
page 125
page 126
page 127
page 128
page 129
page 130
page 131
page 132
page 133
page 134
page 135
page 136
page 137
page 138
page 139
page 140
page 141
page 142
page 143
page 144
page 145
page 146
page 147
page 148
page 149
page 150
page 151
page 152
page 153
page 154
page 155
page 156
page 157
page 158
page 159
page 160
page 161
page 162
page 163
page 164
page 165
page 166
page 167
page 168
page 169
page 170
page 171
page 172
page 173
page 174
page 175
page 176
page 177
page 178
page 179
page 180
page 181
page 182
page 183
page 184
page 185
page 186
page 187
page 188
page 189
page 190
page 191
page 192
page 193
page 194
page 195
page 196
page 197
page 198
page 199
page 200
page 201
page 202
page 203
page 204
page 205
page 206
page 207
page 208
page 209
page 210
page 211
page 212
page 213
page 214
page 215
page 216
page 217
page 218
page 219
page 220
page 221
page 222
page 223
page 224
page 225
page 226

Strategic management: The business process transformation framework JANUARY 10 www. bus- ex. com 11 applications to support business processes. The process design work can be accomplished in less time. Relieved of administrative tasks in documenting the designs, the design team can focus on the critical thinking needed to develop best practice designs that will bring about the desired results for the business. All of this reduces both cost and risk associated with redesigning business processes and implementing software to support the business processes. When multiple business unit implementations are required, the business process transformation framework helps to break down regional communication barriers and accelerates consensus building on how the process needs to work to support the business. This further reduces costs and time to results. In the final article of the series, we will further describe the business process transformation framework design steps. We will provide insight into the lessons learned for consideration against a perceived need to install or re- install an ERP system. We will also provide an overview of the many dos and don'ts to consider before embarking on such a project, including how to drive true business transformation while eliminating the risk of cost overruns and implementation failure. Figure 2. Example process design output using the business process framework Graphical output in the XRM modeling tools often leads to identification of process conflicts and, more importantly, potential opportunities for process improvement. Common opportunities for improvements include the identification of: . Cycle times that do not meet business needs for velocity. . Circular dependencies, including the determination of the key variables involved, so they either can be closely controlled or the process can be designed to eliminate circular dependencies. . Collaborative communication needs to increase the effectiveness of decision- making and to do so more efficiently. The graphical outputs can also be used to communicate clearly the process design during mid-project design reviews. These reviews are needed to ensure common understanding of the processes and to build consensus on how the processes and integration linkages will operate. Conclusion The new business process transformation framework dramatically improves business process redesign and facilitates the proper configuration of software

12 www. bus- ex. com JANUARY 10 Marinette Marine built the first-ever Littoral Combat Ship ( LCS) for the US Navy, and the company anticipates a large contract to build several more. CEO Richard McCreary talks to April Terreri Ship shape T he Littoral Combat Ship ( LCS) is a marvel of engineering design that utilizes a modular platform resulting in the ship's flexible configurations. " Its three missions include anti-submarine warfare, mine countermeasures and anti- surface warfare," explains Richard McCreary, CEO of Marinette Marine Corporation in Marinette, Wisconsin. The LCS is also designed for missions in homeland defense, maritime intercept and special operations. Marinette Marine delivered the US Navy's very first LCS- the USS Freedom- soon to be deployed by the Navy.